1. Does the artist use distinct working methods working methods and processes?
It appears to be a Bauhaus work as the artist, Hans-Siebert von Heister, began this movement in 1919 as an offspring of the German Expressionist movement of the pre-war era. As an expressionist work, the work uses many warm colors alongside the black and stark red background behind the strange creature in the middle, assumed to be a characterization of anger. Therefore, yes.
2. Has the artwork been created in isolation, in collaboration, with a fabrication team? What kinds of materials were used? Traditional, unconventional, or a combination?
It seems to have been made by a single artist as the style of the painting is consistent throughout with the stark triangular shapes in the top, center, and bottom of the painting. Materials used were oil paint on a canvas. Therefore, a traditional material and method was used to create the artwork.
3. Does the artwork reference elements from popular culture, mass media, or art history?
It references the anger experienced by the Germans following World War I which was part of the popular culture of Germany at the time. Therefore, yes, somewhat.
4. Does the artwork serve as a form of critique, questioning, or reframing debates about art or society?
It does seem to question German society and its apparent blindness to the reality that the Germans were thrust upon by the Allied powers following World War I. Also, it expresses anger at the fact that the defeated Germans were in a state of constant poverty while the Allies look on and continue failed attempts to refinance them.
No comments:
Post a Comment